History and Art Journal

Curation Policy & Evaluation Process

All records and manuscripts submitted to History and Art Journal undergo an editorial curation process before acceptance to ensure academic quality and thematic coherence.

Once this initial screening is passed, manuscripts are evaluated through a double-blind peer review system. Throughout this process, the anonymity of both the authors and the external reviewers is strictly preserved.

The editorial team reviews and evaluates submissions based on the following criteria:

• Relevance: Direct alignment with the fields of history, art, cultural heritage, and documentary studies.

• Academic Rigor: Clarity of argumentation, solid methodology, and structural clarity.

• Sources & Citation: Proper citation practices and responsible use of sources.

• Ethics & Legal Standards: Compliance with ethical standards, including copyright and image reproduction rights.

• Alignment: Consistency with the journal’s scope and mission.

Submissions that meet these criteria are accepted for publication in the journal. Manuscripts that require modifications may be returned to the authors with editorial recommendations. The editorial team reserves the right to decline submissions that do not fit the journal’s academic standards or thematic focus.